I have a thing about learning my students’ names. And it’s not a good thing.
I think I have a fixed mindset when it comes to learning people’s names: I believe I can’t do it. So whenever someone introduces him- or herself, a piece of my brain shuts off for a couple of seconds and the name go in one ear and out the other. That’s really annoying when I can’t call them by name just 5 seconds later!
The first step is admitting I have a problem, right? These days, I deliberately “activate” my brain when I’m about to meet someone: Okay, here comes somebody new. Listen for their name. Listen…listen…listen…got it! “Nice to meet you, [insert name here]”
Of course, I ignore all this advice when it comes to students in my classes. I used to teach introductory astronomy with 200-300 students. I mean, c’mon, what am I supposed to do, learn all their names? Bah, forget about it.
A Critical Moment
Then something happened last summer. I was observing a class at UCSD taught by one of our Summer Graduate Teaching Scholars — Ph.D. students selected to teach a course in Summer Session with support from the Center for Teaching Development. David was teaching an anthropology class about multiculturalism to about 50 students. His goal was to regularly spark discussion in class, getting students to share their own diverse cultural experiences. At first, David easily called on about half a dozen students by name, most of whom sat near the front of the room. “Uh-oh,” I thought to myself, “he knows the names of the enthusiastic students, potentially excluding the others from the ‘teacher’s pet’ club.” Someone else put up a hand and then David did something that still sticks in my memory: he looked right at the student, said, “Yes…uhhh…” and looked down at his classlist with student photos and names, found the right person, “…John*, what would like to add?” [*it wasn’t John, I don’t think. I wasn’t listening. See above.] David made it clear he wanted to learn their names and they saw the effort he was putting into it. Later in the same class, he called on someone at the back of the room, by name, who he remembered had written something about the event they were discussing.
Even though the room was narrow and dark, with the studnets on one end and David on the other, it felt like a community. They were all learning together. People engaged all over the room, not just the front rows. Wow. I believe that David knowing his students’ names was a critical factor in that success.
Fall 2013 – My Turn
When it was my turn to teach again, a class for 40 grad students and postdocs about teaching and learning in higher ed, I vowed to learn their names. I made a print-out of their names and photos (pro tip: alphabetized by first name). When they were working in small groups, I took the time to deliberately look at each student and recall his or her name, consulting my cheat sheet only when necessary. Honestly, it didn’t take long before I was comfortable calling them by name. And it was great, especially since I was able to link their blog posts with their faces and could say, “Amy, you wrote about that on the blog. Could you share what you wrote with us?”
Winter 2014
I’m about to teach this same class again, this time with 64 students. As I spent a precious holiday afternoon sitting at my computer downloading and formatting students pictures into a class list, I wondered if it was really worth the effort. Wondered on Twitter, that is:
Hey, #highered instructor friends! On a scale of 1=waste of time to 5=crucial, where do you rank learning your students’ names?
— Peter Newbury (@polarisdotca) January 2, 2014
What a thrill to open Twitter a few hours later and see my timeline full of responses. Almost everyone agreed that it’s crucial but more difficult to accomplish, the larger the class:
@polarisdotca scales with size of class, but normally right up there around 5
— Andy Rundquist (@arundquist) January 2, 2014
@polarisdotca 5, but I teach small classes
— Bud Talbot (@Bud_T) January 2, 2014
@polarisdotca 5 but size of class usually determines how successful I am. #highered
— Nyasha Junior (@NyashaJunior) January 2, 2014
@polarisdotca 4. learning the names of the most engaged students demonstrates your respect for & impresses *all* of the students.
— Kelle Cruz (@kellecruz) January 2, 2014
@polarisdotca 5. I’ve had students mention how important it was to THEM that I knew their names. Made me seem approachable than other profs.
— Lisa Will (@dustchick) January 2, 2014
@polarisdotca 4 (intro) to 5 (majors)
— Danny Caballero (@physicistdanny) January 2, 2014
— William D. Adler (@williamadler78) January 2, 2014
@polarisdotca 5 for sure but my classes are only 30-40. But I still love & talk about my 1st phys prof who learned 150 names+pers info.
— marieclaire shanahan (@mcshanahan) January 2, 2014
@polarisdotca 4-5. And I’m awful at it. It’s a source of great guilt and frustration for me. 🙁
— Aven (@AvenSarah) January 2, 2014
Some were clear that it’s not easy in really large classes:
@polarisdotca Good question. I’d say somewhere around 4-5 for smaller classes. Huge lecture classes, impossible. — ✜ Stephen Ransom (@ransomtech) January 2, 2014
@polarisdotca Depends on the size of the class. In a class of 80, I’ll try to know most (3). In a class of 200, forget it (1). — Spencer Bagley (@sbagley) January 2, 2014
On the other hand, class size doesn’t bother @raulpacheco:
.@polarisdotca I have always made it my priority to learn my students’ names and to this day, I remember ALL of them. Even with 120 folks — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) January 2, 2014
@mcshanahan @polarisdotca my record in the same year is 2011 with 400 students’ names 🙂 — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) January 2, 2014
@bfwriter noticed that @kellecruz says she learns the names of her engaged students:
@kellecruz @polarisdotca aren’t the disengaged students the ones who need you most? might you convert them by making an effort to interact? — barefootwriter (@bfwriter) January 2, 2014
To which Kelle elaborated
@bfwriter among 300, I’m only gonna learn names of the students who regularly ask questions/come to office hours. @polarisdotca
— Kelle Cruz (@kellecruz) January 2, 2014
@bfwriter in a smaller class (<40), I try to learn all names…because it’s the mutually respectful thing to do. @polarisdotca
— Kelle Cruz (@kellecruz) January 2, 2014
@bfwriter in small classes, I don’t force it. I encourage, incentivize. I make class engaging, it’s up to them to play or not @polarisdotca
— Kelle Cruz (@kellecruz) January 2, 2014
The last words, for now, go to @ProfNoodlearms for viewing name-learning as a consequence, not a catalyst, of learning
@polarisdotca No number. This is a secondary indicator. If i interact meaningfully and repeatedly with my students, it just happens.
— TJ Hitchman (@ProfNoodlearms) January 2, 2014
…and to @DRPicardHIS for using names to build these connections amongst the students, too:
@polarisdotca 5 (~30 Ss). Even in classes of 16 I teach for the day. But I also make my Ss learn each others’ names at start of semester.
— Danielle R. Picard (@DRPicardHIS) January 2, 2014
Is it worth the effort?
In a word, yes. Learn as many names as you can. Even if you only learn half of them, it may seem to the students that you know them all. And that feeling of connection and community might be enough to get all of your students engaged and learning.
How do YOU do it?
Do you learn your students’ names? If you have a good method, would you leave a comment to share it with us? Thanks!